Philadelphia's penalty discipline created the difference in a game Boston controlled for long stretches but couldn't finish. PHI's structural advantages β faceoff dominance, shot volume, and giveaway suppression β compounded a Bruins team that gifted opponents the ice.
β‘TURNING POINT
Martone's overtime power-play goal at 2:31 converted PHI's only realistic path to victory: a man advantage Boston handed them through penalty infractions. Boston's 12 PIMs to Philadelphia's 4 created the decisive structural imbalance that the Bruins could not recover from once overtime began.
πWHY PHI WON
β’
Philadelphia's faceoff dominance (59.3%, 35 of 59) controlled puck possession throughout, generating 31 shots to Boston's 19 and sustaining sustained offensive zone pressure.
β’
Boston's 18 giveaways against PHI's 8 functioned as a possession tax β every giveaway reset Philadelphia's attack and denied Boston the sustained sequences needed to bury their chances.
β’
Vladar conceded 0.90 goals below league average on 19 shots β in a two-goal game, that margin held the structure intact long enough for overtime.
πWHY BOS LOST
β’
Boston took 12 PIMs to Philadelphia's 4, handing PHI the man advantages that produced the winning goal β this is a self-inflicted loss.
β’
A 40.7% faceoff rate meant Boston started from a structural deficit on every draw, limiting clean zone entries and compressing their offensive opportunities to 19 shots.
β’
Boston generated 18 giveaways β the highest-leverage executional failure in the game, repeatedly ceding territory in a tight one-goal contest.
Three Stars
Porter Martone1st
PHI, R
1G 1A5 shots on goal+1PPG
His 5 shots led all skaters and his power-play winner in overtime was the direct causal endpoint of Philadelphia's victory.
Christian Dvorak2nd
PHI, C
1G 1A20:04 TOI+1
Dvorak opened scoring and assisted the overtime winner, accounting for a point on both Philadelphia goals.
Dan Vladar3rd
PHI, G
SV% 0.94718/19 saves
Vladar conceded 0.90 goals below league average β in a two-goal game decided in overtime, that margin was load-bearing.
"
Boston didn't lose this game in overtime β they lost it in the penalty box, handing Philadelphia the discipline edge that turned a winnable road game into a gift.
Β·Momentum Shift
Philadelphia surrendered shot parity in the second period (11 each) but recaptured territorial control in the third with a 10-to-4 shot advantage, forcing Boston into a reactive posture. That third-period dominance compressed Boston's attack and set the conditions for overtime where PHI, not BOS, controlled the decisive sequence.
