Tampa Bay Lightning — Stats, Schedule & Insights

Team Snapshot

🔍

Key Insight

Tampa Bay's elite defensive structure (3rd in GA, 82.6% PK) and second-period dominance (100 GF, 69 GA) have carried them to 106 points despite a 17th-ranked power play that leaves 15-20 goals on the table compared to top-10 units. The recent 2-3-0 slide averaging 1.8 goals per game exposes offensive fragility when special teams go cold, but the underlying defensive foundation remains playoff-caliber.

Strengths

Elite penalty kill (82.6%, 3rd) neutralizes opponent power plays and limits high-danger situations to 45 goals against across 258 opportunities—this directly protects the +59 goal differential and prevents comeback scenarios

Second-period dominance (100 GF, 69 GA, +31 differential) is the single most repeatable advantage, allowing the team to build leads and dictate pace when opponents are most vulnerable to momentum swings

Road resilience (24-12-5) demonstrates structural soundness independent of matchup advantages, with only 5 regulation losses away from home indicating the defensive system travels

Third-period goal prevention (80 GA) closes games effectively once ahead, with 101 GF providing insurance—this combination turns two-goal leads into wins at a high rate

Risks

The 17th-ranked power play (20.7%) is the single largest drag on offensive ceiling, costing 15-20 goals compared to top-10 units and eliminating the margin for error in playoff series where special teams decide tight games

Last-5 offensive collapse (1.8 GPG, 49% below season rate) exposes depth concerns when top lines go cold—this drought directly caused the 2-3-0 slide and signals vulnerability to structured playoff checking

First-period defensive leakage (76 GA vs 79 GF) forces the team to chase early deficits, burning energy and reducing the effectiveness of the second-period system that defines their identity

Missing goaltending data prevents assessment of whether Vasilevskiy's form supports the defensive metrics or whether shot suppression is masking save percentage decline—this uncertainty is critical entering playoff scenarios where goaltending separates contenders

Last 5 Record

2W–3L

Avg Scored (L5)

1.8↓1.0 vs prev 5

Avg Conceded (L5)

2.0

The last-5 stretch (2-3-0, 1.8 GF, 2.0 GA) represents offensive shutdown rather than defensive collapse—scoring has dropped 49% below season average while goals-against remains near baseline. This trend suggests special teams inefficiency (power play likely 0-for or 1-for in recent games) rather than structural breakdown. If offensive deployment returns to second-period form, the team projects to stabilize immediately; if the power play remains dormant, this becomes a first-round liability.

Core Analytics

Core Performance

Offence

Ranking 4th in goals per game (3.54) is driven by 5v5 execution rather than special teams, as the 20.7% power play sits 17th league-wide and converts at a rate 4-5 percentage points below contenders. Second-period scoring (100 goals, best of any frame) creates separation in tight games, while third-period production (101 goals) protects leads. The last-5 offensive collapse to 1.8 GPG signals reliance on rhythm rather than depth—when the power play stalls, goal production craters.

3.54Avg 3.08

4th in NHL

Defence

The 2.82 goals-against average (3rd in NHL) reflects systematic defensive discipline, with the penalty kill (82.6%, 3rd) erasing opponent advantages and limiting damage to 45 goals against across 258 opportunities. Second-period defensive dominance (69 GA, 31-goal differential with offense) turns momentum and protects narrow leads. First-period vulnerability (76 GA vs 79 GF) creates early deficits that force the team to chase, but third-period tightness (80 GA) closes games effectively once ahead.

2.82Avg 3.08

3rd in NHL

Special Teams

Top Players

Jake Guentzel

Center · #

PTS

Brandon Hagel

Left Wing · #

PTS

Goals Scored — Last 10 Games

Scoring has dropped noticeably over the last 5 games — a 1.0 goal/game decline vs the previous 5 aligns with the recent dip in results.

Goals For

Goals Against

1–2

MTL

May 3

1–0

MTL

May 1

2–3

MTL

Apr 29