Knight conceding 4.80 goals above average handed Carolina a game they were already winning — Chicago never had a goaltender, so they never had a chance.
Carolina's best team dismantled Chicago's worst nightmare: a goaltender conceding nearly five goals above average behind a roster with no margin for error. This was a structural mismatch that became a rout the moment Chicago's crease failed to compensate for its skaters' limitations.
⚡TURNING POINT
Hall's goal at 8:13 of the third made it 6–2 with under twelve minutes remaining, eliminating any mathematical basis for a Chicago rally. It was decisive not because it extended the lead but because it arrived 84 seconds after Frondell's goal had briefly suggested life — the response killed Chicago's last emotional opening before the game became garbage time.
🏆WHY CAR WON
•
Seven forwards contributed at least one point, distributing offensive production across lines so broadly that Chicago could not key on any single threat.
•
Stankoven generated 3 points and 2 goals in 17:44, providing the offensive backbone that gave Carolina a multi-goal cushion before the second period began.
•
Andersen conceded 0.50 goals below league average on 25 shots — his stability ensured Carolina's lead was never structurally threatened.
📉WHY CHI LOST
•
Knight conceded 4.80 goals above league average on 22 shots — in a five-goal game, that margin alone decided the outcome before roster quality was ever a factor.
•
Chicago generated 25 shots but converted only twice, failing to translate volume into pressure that could force Carolina into defensive breakdowns.
•
Going 0-for-5 on the power play eliminated the only special-teams mechanism that could have compressed the deficit.
Three Stars
Logan Stankoven1st
CAR, C
2G1A3P2 SOGTOI 17:44
His two goals in the first and second periods established the lead that made Chicago's deficit unrecoverable before the third period began.
William Carrier2nd
CAR, L
3A+/- +3TOI 10:40
Three assists from a forward with zero shots on goal signals that Carrier's playmaking was generating dangerous situations that capitalized directly on Chicago's defensive structure breaking down.
Anton Frondell3rd
CHI, C
2G5 SOGTOI 19:46
Both Chicago goals belonged to him, and his 5 shots on goal represented the only sustained offensive threat Chicago produced.
