San Jose's faceoff stranglehold and below-average goaltending margin made this a structural win, not a fortunate one.
San Jose's dominant faceoff control and physical structure dismantled Chicago's ability to sustain offensive zone time, and Alex Nedeljkovic's margin below average goaltending proved decisive in a one-goal regulation game. The Blackhawks entered SAP Center as a playoff long shot and left with confirmation of why they're eighth in the Central.
⚡TURNING POINT
Eklund's equalizer at 6:57 of the second period erased Chicago's lead and immediately transferred territorial control to San Jose on home ice. From that moment, the Sharks outscored the Blackhawks 2-1 and never surrendered the lead again.
🏆WHY SJS WON
•
San Jose won 69.2% of faceoffs — 36 of 52 — eliminating Chicago's ability to establish possession and forcing the Blackhawks into a defensive posture for most of the game.
•
Nedeljkovic conceded 0.90 goals below league average on 29 shots; in a one-goal game, that margin directly preserved the win.
•
San Jose's 27 hits to Chicago's 8 established physical dominance that compressed Chicago's time and space throughout the second and third periods.
📉WHY CHI LOST
•
Chicago's 30.8% faceoff rate meant they spent the game chasing pucks rather than dictating play — no possession, no sustained pressure.
•
Knight conceded 0.70 goals above league average on 23 shots; in a three-goal game, that margin cost Chicago the result.
•
Chicago converted 0-of-2 power plays while surrendering one to San Jose, a net special-teams loss that proved fatal in a tight game.
Three Stars
William Eklund1st
SJS, L
1G1A2P+2
His goal restored parity and his assist on Sherwood's go-ahead goal made him the direct architect of San Jose's winning sequence.
Kiefer Sherwood2nd
SJS, L
1G5 hits+2
His scoring and physical engagement at 5 hits set the tone for San Jose's territorial dominance.
Will Smith3rd
SJS, C
1G+117:47 TOI
His third-period goal extended San Jose's lead to two and forced Chicago into a comeback they couldn't complete.
